• Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.

    Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.

    Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?

China up to No Good?

Eeveelution

Eeveelution

Among the few morons with straight A's.
China is basically sheltering its own citizens, which I personally think is wrong. They are currently creating a special program that will block certain websites from inside the computer. And the one child law? It's made with good intentions, but it was horrible when the earthquake hit. During the earthquake's aftermath, many other countries offered help but they refused it. It makes you wonder what they're hiding there.

Does anyone else agree the government is hiding something from the rest of the world? It's all so weird what they're doing, refusing help when they needed it. And Tibet's citizens were particularly unhappy when the Olympics were in China. I'm not sure, but wasn't the Buddha banned from going there? Very suspicious.
 
Eeveelution said:
[The one child law was] made with good intentions, but it was horrible when the earthquake hit.
Click to expand...
I fail to see how the One Child Law is relevant to the Sichuan Earthquake in 2008. Were parents allowed to have more children, then one must imagine that more children would have lived in the part of China worst hit by the earthquake. Were more children there, then more would have died, and the tragedy would have been even greater.
Eeveelution said:
And Tibet's citizens were particularly unhappy when the Olympics were in China.
Click to expand...
I honestly don't believe that the people of Tibet were, as a whole, particularly upset that China had been selected to host the 2008 Olympic Games. If I recall, then they were mostly upset because they weren't being granted independence, and they'd been upset about that for some time- that is, since whenever Tibet was taken over by the Chinese last.
Eeveelution said:
I'm not sure, but wasn't the Buddha banned from going there?
Click to expand...
Wouldn't've been too hard to've stopped 'im. The Buddha's been dead for well over a thousand years. They might have banned the Dalai Lama from attending, though, but I'm not sure he woulda gone anyway if they woulda let 'im.
As for computer censorship, I believe that the Chinese government is instituting it not to protect its citizens, but to protect its governors. The internet allows one to see what happens in other parts of the world, and to tell other people what one thinks about what's happening where one is and in other parts of the world, and even to compare events abroad with domestic issues, if one should so desire. Most people, if asked, would probably say that China's government is doing many things wrong. Consider that in China, there are quite a few people, and the number of people in China with computer and internet access is... well, it'd probably be growing daily if it weren't for the current global recession, but at any rate, there's a lot of people online in China. If all Chinese were allowed to see what the rest of the world thought of the Chinese government, what other Chinese thought of the Chinese government, and discuss how to change things, then China's current government might lose support and lose power. By disallowing this free access to all parts of the internet, the Chinese government probably hopes to sustain its power for at least a while longer.
 
Honalululand said:
I fail to see how the One Child Law is relevant to the Sichuan Earthquake in 2008. Were parents allowed to have more children, then one must imagine that more children would have lived in the part of China worst hit by the earthquake. Were more children there, then more would have died, and the tragedy would have been even greater.

I honestly don't believe that the people of Tibet were, as a whole, particularly upset that China had been selected to host the 2008 Olympic Games. If I recall, then they were mostly upset because they weren't being granted independence, and they'd been upset about that for some time- that is, since whenever Tibet was taken over by the Chinese last.

Wouldn't've been too hard to've stopped 'im. The Buddha's been dead for well over a thousand years. They might have banned the Dalai Lama from attending, though, but I'm not sure he woulda gone anyway if they woulda let 'im.
As for computer censorship, I believe that the Chinese government is instituting it not to protect its citizens, but to protect its governors. The internet allows one to see what happens in other parts of the world, and to tell other people what one thinks about what's happening where one is and in other parts of the world, and even to compare events abroad with domestic issues, if one should so desire. Most people, if asked, would probably say that China's government is doing many things wrong. Consider that in China, there are quite a few people, and the number of people in China with computer and internet access is... well, it'd probably be growing daily if it weren't for the current global recession, but at any rate, there's a lot of people online in China. If all Chinese were allowed to see what the rest of the world thought of the Chinese government, what other Chinese thought of the Chinese government, and discuss how to change things, then China's current government might lose support and lose power. By disallowing this free access to all parts of the internet, the Chinese government probably hopes to sustain its power for at least a while longer.
Click to expand...

In the case of tl;dr, misinformed OP is misinformed and Chinese government is censoring its suckiness.
 
Mm-hmm. China isn't hiding anything from the rest of the world, it's hiding it from its own people. Well, trying to.
 
Honalululand said:
I fail to see how the One Child Law is relevant to the Sichuan Earthquake in 2008. Were parents allowed to have more children, then one must imagine that more children would have lived in the part of China worst hit by the earthquake. Were more children there, then more would have died, and the tragedy would have been even greater.

I honestly don't believe that the people of Tibet were, as a whole, particularly upset that China had been selected to host the 2008 Olympic Games. If I recall, then they were mostly upset because they weren't being granted independence, and they'd been upset about that for some time- that is, since whenever Tibet was taken over by the Chinese last.

Wouldn't've been too hard to've stopped 'im. The Buddha's been dead for well over a thousand years. They might have banned the Dalai Lama from attending, though, but I'm not sure he woulda gone anyway if they woulda let 'im.
As for computer censorship, I believe that the Chinese government is instituting it not to protect its citizens, but to protect its governors. The internet allows one to see what happens in other parts of the world, and to tell other people what one thinks about what's happening where one is and in other parts of the world, and even to compare events abroad with domestic issues, if one should so desire. Most people, if asked, would probably say that China's government is doing many things wrong. Consider that in China, there are quite a few people, and the number of people in China with computer and internet access is... well, it'd probably be growing daily if it weren't for the current global recession, but at any rate, there's a lot of people online in China. If all Chinese were allowed to see what the rest of the world thought of the Chinese government, what other Chinese thought of the Chinese government, and discuss how to change things, then China's current government might lose support and lose power. By disallowing this free access to all parts of the internet, the Chinese government probably hopes to sustain its power for at least a while longer.
Click to expand...

First: The one-child law was horrible because some people were too old to have another child after their first one died in the earthquake. Second: I meant they were protesting more violently the way China's government treated them around the Olympics because China was receiving international attention. Third: I meant the Dalli Lama. Fourth: I agree with you 100%. Pornography censorship? Yeah right!
 
Eeveelution said:
First: The one-child law was horrible because some people were too old to have another child after their first one died in the earthquake.
Click to expand...
I don't get this: would it have been less awful had they had more than one child ? I mean in all likelyhood it would've died too and losing one kid when you've still got another is still depressing.
I think the one-child law is a pretty good idea in China because, well, look at the place! There's barely enough space to move! Of course I disagree strongly with killing female babies, but I think each couple being encouraged to have one child is okay.

Second: I meant they were protesting more violently the way China's government treated them around the Olympics because China was receiving international attention.
Click to expand...
Well that's because they were hoping to attract the world's attention on the fact that China's been oppressing them for years.
And China accused the Dalai Lama & co of being terrorists at one point so he got pretty pissed off at that as well.

Third: I meant the Dalli Lama.
Click to expand...
Not buddha ): Simple buddhist monk!

Fourth: I agree with you 100%. Pornography censorship? Yeah right!
Click to expand...
Yeah the censorship in China's overblown and dumb. But it's a shittily done Communist regime, what'd you expect.
 
Isn't there something like seven men to every woman in the 1-child generation because boys are preferred children to girls?
 
ultraviolet said:
Isn't there something like seven men to every woman in the 1-child generation because boys are preferred children to girls?
Click to expand...

Yep.

In a few decades, China's population will probably decrease rapidly and then it might stabilize, if by then people don't prefer boys to girls.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom