Hi!
I don't really feel like I have a specific gender! I'm
not a boy or a girl, and I'm
not agendered (it's really frustrating that there's the idea that if I'm not a boy or a girl, I
have to be agendered, but I'm just not), but I'm also kind of all of those? I don't feel the exact same way all the time, sometimes I feel like more in particular of one or two of those, or more like none of those, or anything. I don't like using a particular word like "genderqueer" because even if a word is kind of defined so that it seems right, that doesn't mean everyone ever defines or understands it exactly the same way. Also, "genderqueer" seems to have some pretty specific ideas surrounding it already, and I don't feel like I identify in particular with any of those exact ideas, so it makes more sense and is more accurate to just say I identify as myself! And that feels better anyway because "myself" can be whatever I feel like and doesn't rely on being a defined thing, and really what I'm really uncomfortable with is being stuck into a box. It doesn't really matter what the box is named or how well-intentioned it is, it just feels bad! I don't mind any pronouns in particular (except I don't want to be called "it") as long as I feel like it would be okay to go "um! by the way I'm not that pronoun" and the person wouldn't go "yes you are stop being weird!!!"! Like, it doesn't matter how successful the person would be at using a different set of pronouns, or even if they agree to use them, really, just as long as it doesn't feel like a
trap. In real life being referred to as specific pronouns feels really sharp and mean because there's nothing I can do about it and it feels like if I ever tried to explain to someone, then I'd just get yelled at and even more boxed in! It was kind of strange for a while when I started getting called the same pronouns in the tcod community, because it didn't and doesn't feel sharp or mean or scary, and I thought that was just the way it felt always!
Alternate pronouns are super-great! I really really like the idea that it's okay for anyone to use anything they want for themselves, and then they'll be comfortable and happy! Lots of people feel like they're stuck using "he" or "she" because it feels like no one would understand or comply with anything else, even if there's another set they'd like a lot better - or maybe they don't know any set they'd like better, just that "he" and "she" don't feel exactly right! Also, I like the idea that people could just make up pronouns as long as they're reasonable?
Re/rer/rem,
ke/kir/kirs,
ce/cer/ces, anything that's similar to that would be just as easy to adopt as anything else new. I've experimented with doing that some since getting used to a couple of sets of alternate pronouns in the first place, and it really seems fairly easy - or at least not
more difficult. It's totally understandable for people to get confused about which pronouns to use if that were a big thing, but it's understandable even with only two or three pronoun sets, and I think most people would be fine with mistakes as long as the others are understanding about it and trying? And! Another thing I really like about getting used to non-standard pronouns is that it makes you think a lot more carefully about which pronouns you're using for someone! If you just have "he" and "she", then that
seems like it would be simpler, but then it's really easy to call someone the wrong one on accident, or to suddenly assume someone uses a pronoun when ey doesn't. And it's kind of difficult to just
not do that even if you know it makes people uncomfortable and you really don't want to make people uncomfortable. I'm sure you can get used to being really careful otherwise, but it's just easier with strange pronouns because you have to think about how they go until you get used to them! (also it's way less difficult than it looks like! It's not impossible, you just have to practice!)
Regarding gender roles and things, someone suggested to me that stereo-typing can be okay in some cases? Her example was Christmas presents for strange kids, and she said that if you base your toy choice for em on a stereo-type, you're more
likely to give a present the kid would like than if you picked the oppositely marketed toy? That still bothers me and I want stereo-types to just not exist at all, but what do you think of ideas like that?
Also I talked with the same person about labels the other day and she basically said that the general public doesn't need to know most of the words as long as they're okay with the thing! Like, the general public knowing that "pansexuality" is a thing isn't important, just them knowing it's okay for people loving whoever they want is important. And her other example was that it's not too important for people to understand what asexuality is because she says people are already accepting of a no-sex lifestyle like people are okay with nuns and monks and things! She said that trying to make the general public learn a bunch of labels and things will just confuse them and make them not want to learn about the thing! I don't really agree that people are generally accepting of celibacy, because there's all this bad stuff about how you're a "loser" or that something's wrong with you as a person or that no one likes you if you choose not to have sex, and lots of people are not okay with people loving whoever they love. But otherwise I think the idea of keeping things as simple as possible for most people is sound?
Honestly, how I see it all, is that we basically are the gender we identify with. If you want to be called a girl, then you are one, the same with a boy.
The same with other genders, too, right?
1) I use they/their/them as gender-neutral pronouns - I think that the coined ones sound far too fake, and, quite frankly, slightly degrading to non-cisgenders.
They sound a lot less "fake" if you start using them! Sometimes alternate pronouns still look kind of irregular in the middle of text, but it depends on which one it is, and also you can definitely get used to seeing and hearing them.
They/their/them is inconvenient as a way to say "I don't know what pronouns this person uses" because it already exists as a different thing, and it still uses plurals to go with it, and if you're not careful your sentences can get really confusing (which is too bad since it's what some people are comfortable with!). Also, how on earth is it degrading?
E(y)/eir/em is mostly just a way of being gender-neutral, which isn't degrading at all, sometimes you just don't know someone's pronouns yet or you're talking about a hypothetical person. And in general people
choose to ask people to use alternate pronouns, it's not forced on them! If you mean it's degrading because calling trans* people gender-neutral instead of their preferred pronoun (when you know the preferred pronoun perfectly well) is not okay, I'm pretty sure no one is doing that (or if they are, that's absolutely not the fault of the pronoun and that shouldn't keep it from being used). And you definitely can't just stick with "he" and "she" because some people are neither of those!
If everyone just saw how they feel about things as how they feel, I think that would be pretty useful. I mean, isn't it kind of unfair to be all "I wish gender could just disappear! That'd be a great world!" when gender is very important to lots of people, and may be an immensely important part of their life? What about the trans people you know who struggle with not being perceived as how they are and this important thing that they feel being dismissed by nearly everyone they've ever known? Isn't it better to accept their feelings as valid and important, just maybe not how you feel or see things? [...] we live in this world and it might seem to them that you're just dismissing a sense of self that they feel very strongly. Does that make sense? I am nooot so great at the wording things thing.
I think there's kind of a difference between someone saying "I wish this thing that hurts people just weren't a thing at all!" and someone having the choice to get rid of it and choosing to? Like! If it weren't a thing at all, it wouldn't be hurting people, so I think it's easy for someone to wish for it even if they know it's important for some people, or if they don't realize it's important for some people! Too, it wouldn't
be important for those people if it had never ever existed!
But I think that makes sense and also I hadn't really thought about it from that point of view! For the people it's a big deal for, they'd be different if that part of them went away, and they wouldn't have all those experiences that are probably kind of important, too!
Especially ones who maybe aren't sure but don't want a bunch of people jumping on them, because if you aren't sure but genuinely interested in learning, it's sometimes hard to get across your sincerity!
There are lots of times where I see people who look sincere to me when they're wondering about things, and they get attacked a lot when they try to ask questions and it makes me feel really really bad for them because they usually seem really friendly and curious! I think things would be a lot easier if the people who didn't understand had somewhere where they felt like they could go "um! I'm not trying to be hurtful I'm sorry if that's how it sounds but I was wondering..." I've seen people get jumped on for asking things even here even if they were nice about the ask.
:(
I like to use "they" as a gender-neutral word.
All the other ones sound stupid and I don't use it, though, except for "xir" and "xe," but that's just 'cause I use it on a RP where xe is an alien with no human genders (ie he/she/they/ect.)
It's not really up to you whether or not they sound "stupid" and it's kind of not nice to say so because it's pretty important to some people! Also what do you do if someone wants another pronoun set that you think sounds "stupid"? It would be pretty no fair to say that everyone has to use every set of pronouns perfectly always, but don't you feel like it would be nice if you at least tried regardless of whether or not you like the pronoun? They're not as impossible as they seem like they would be so you should at least try some and see how it goes!
Wait, are you guys saying that you'd use 'they' by default, or that you wouldn't use other pronouns if someone asked you to? I can understand not referring to someone you don't know as ey when you can just use they, but it seems kind of horrible to refuse to use a pronoun if someone asks for it!
Sometimes a pronoun looks like it would be really difficult to use and I think people get kind of intimidated, especially if it's out loud! I think they should definitely try anyway, but I think most people refusing to use a pronoun just think it would be too hard and don't understand how using the wrong one can be uncomfortable or hurtful!
wait
what
a hell of a lot of people reject the gender roles associated with their sex, but surely that doesn't make them genderqueer?? I thought genderqueer was identifying as a gender outside the binary
Um! That's a sentence I helped with and I totally didn't mean for it to sound like it's saying "all trans* people are also genderqueer". I think how the word genderqueer is defined is kind of unclear, and the Wikipedia page about it has lots of things it can mean that don't necessarily mean outside of the binary, for instance it can mean someone who feels bi-gendered or gender-fluid. Also, I've seen "transgender" or "trans*" used to mean "boy/female or girl/male
only", and also to mean "anyone who is not-cis"? Is there a consensus on what it should mean, exactly?
Even if they meant the same thing, it's understandable if you wouldn't want one of the words forced on you, though! How do you think it should be worded so that that doesn't bother people? Maybe just "or genderqueer" instead of "or otherwise"?
I guess what I'm trying to ask is, if you think that gender is a product of society, but reject the concept of gender roles, then what do you think gender is based on? What does being male or female mean to you? I imagine it can't be easy to describe, but I'd appreciate it if someone tried.
ETA: And another thing: where does the clear distinction between male/female (sexes) and man/woman (genders) come from? I've never seen it outside this forum, and I've just asked my (social anthropologist) sister about it, and she was confused too.
Well, there needs to be
some way to distinguish between "someone who feels like this" and "someone who has this chromosome" and it's harder to talk about and a lot harder to explain to people if you use "male/female" and "boy/girl" for
both sex and gender! And doing it this way is kind of the easiest because there's already an understanding of what the words basically mean, so people can understand if you say something like "I'm male but a girl" and explain! If new words created instead, then people would have to tell everyone about the new words and it would be really hard! Too, some people feel like there's a distinction between feeling like a girl or a boy but being okay with their sex, and feeling like they should definitely have male or female parts, so it's kind of hard to explain that otherwise! Do you think there's a better way to talk about it, and if there is what do you suppose it would be like?
Also! A thing for me was that I realized I felt really bad about what people were referring to me as and thinking about me based on my sex, so I tried to have people on the Internet refer to me the "opposite" way! Except when I actually got to be referred to that way and people started making assumptions and boxing based on that, too, I realized that that felt about the same! I think it's similar and part of the feeling for some other people, like, maybe part of it is that people feel like rejecting the assigned one? And then the not-assigned one would feel more like a choice so that could feel a lot better even if with no gender roles or stereo-types or anything someone might never think about being not-cisgendered! I don't mean to say that people are wrong about their gender or only feeling that way because of society, but that could be a factor for some people!
But. I don't really believe you guys go by your chosen pronouns because 'that's how you grew up'. Really? You are not the sort of people that just go with what you grew up doing because that's how you grew up. If you disagree with it, why do you do it? Honestly, it seems to me that you do prefer your chosen pronouns, at least to a certain extent, otherwise you would protest a bit more.
Why can't you believe that someone would do that? If someone feels like which pronoun you use for em is honestly arbitrary and ey feels no difference whatsoever, there's really no reason for em to change it, is there? If there's nothing about the pronoun you grew up with that makes you uncomfortable in any way, what is there to protest about? Ey may as well stick with one ey's already accustomed to!
For your name analogy, someone might not be totally in love with eir name and feel like it's the best name ey could ever have, it might just be an okay name! It's kind of tough to change your name and to get other people to call you it, so if ey doesn't feel any particular resentment toward the name and doesn't really have a new name in mind, why not just use the one ey already has?
Honestly, I'm not sure where that one came from. It actually sort of bugs me because it feels like it's separating cis from trans people. I mean, I know it's the case that it is separated, but I tend to just, ignore it, because it bugs me.
What do you mean by separating? It seems like ideally there isn't too much difference between saying someone is for instance female/girl/cis or female/boy/trans*?