• Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.

    Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.

    Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?

Dominique Strauss-Kahn walks free

goldenquagsire

Rubber dinghy rapids, bro!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/23/dominique-strauss-kahn-charges-dropped

Now, obeying the rules of our legal system is paramount. Once someone has been acquitted they're considered innocent. In fact, all throughout this case DSK has been 'innocent until proven guilty'. Let's also remember the disbelief, the shameful comments and claims of a conspiracy that circulated the internet when Julian Assange was arrested on similar grounds. After all, justice is blind and you can't curry its favour no matter how righteous your cause is (and conversely, being a shithead does not automatically prove your guilt).

Nevertheless, I smell something rotten at the heart of this.
 
As much as I hate to say it, the majority of rapes just can't be proven as rape.
At the very most, you can prove that sex occurred, but in most cases, it's impossible to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the sex that did occur was non-consensual.
Did he do it? Probably.
Should he have been convicted? No, I don't think so.

On the topic of JA, though, the point there was that the guy had, I think, escaped to Switzerland (or maybe Sweden?) to avoid being sent to America to face trial, at which point he was accused of sexual assault. That was a massive coincidence that was incredibly unlikely to happen.
 
... what? Julian Assange was accused by the Swedish police for an incident in Sweden. America has nothing to do with it. Also, after he was charged he stayed in the UK and eventually gave himself up to the police.

EDIT: Also, why is the victim's word not good enough? We believe a person when they say they didn't give away an item and that it was stolen. Also, in many cases there is physical evidence of rape.
 
Last edited:
Also, in many cases there is physical evidence of rape.
Bang on the money. Strauss-Kahn's semen was found on Diallo's uniform, and doctors proved that she suffered vaginal bruising. The issue of her credibility is meaningless; the physical evidence heavily supports her claim.

At the very most, you can prove that sex occurred, but in most cases, it's impossible to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the sex that did occur was non-consensual.
Vaginal bruising is pretty much 'beyond reasonable doubt', unless one comes to the conclusion that the victim took a baseball bat to her own crotch in order to frame the defendant.

Strauss-Kahn may have won this case, but on his return to France he faces another trial for attempted rape. I hope this case is more succesful.
 
Back
Top Bottom