If they didn't make pokemon, i'd be very tempted to just nuke them out of spite.
Tried nuking Japan before. Twice.
That's a big part of why they came up with Godzilla.
Japan was the first country against which nuclear weapons were used (militarily, as I
knowthat we
tested one in New Mexico first), so it fell to reason that its legacy would become evident first in Japan. People didn't know very much about what radiation did back then, (and we still don't know everything now,) so while some hoped for the best, others feared the worst. Among these fears was that somehow, this radiation that had been infused into the lands of Nagasaki and Hiroshima would somehow spawn huge monsters with grudges against all civilization in general, and Tokyo in particular. Some man eventually managed to sell this idea on the silver screen, and created one of the most iconic monsters of the modern age.
What's my point?
You can nuke Japan, and decimate its towns, cutting through buildings and people like a well-made machete through thicket and bush, but like a the plants of a jungle, its people will move back and reclaim the space you've cleared away, sometimes even creating things better than before.
In any case, Japan's a pretty funky place- and I mean that, if not in a good way, then in as neutral of a way as possible. Ever since the dawn of Japanese civilization, it's managed to always retain a unique flavor, even while incorporating the ideas and values of other peoples and lands into its own. It
does have a legacy, though, of radical xenophobia, and obviously, some people still feel that way today. What shocked me most, I have to admit, about that article, is that the bulk of immigrant workers being discussed were from Peru and Brazil.
On the topic of the offer of paying to send these workers back home if they'd agree not to return, I have to say that I find it considerate at least to offer them money. Sure, it's still just a gold plating a offer that's, at the least, pretty bad, but it's more appealing than just shoving a lousy offer in immigrants' faces and asking them to take it that way.
I guess what I mean to say is, that I wouldn't condemn a country for offering to help impoverished immigrants return to their home countries if they wanted to by giving them funding. I do, however, consider the clause forbidding reapplication for work visas rather harsh, even if I do see the logic behind it. If what people are reacting to here is the xenophobia in the article, then I'm just saying that though I'm not surprised, I still don't like it.