Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
The problem is that Orwell's fiction works are basically just an extension of his non-fiction. He became temperamentally incapable of writing books that serve a literary purpose before a political one. That's why his writing style is non-literary and plain even in 1984, which is supposedly a science-fiction novel. I think he felt that whenever he was addressing a large audience, it was wrong not to say something political. And if 1984 and Animal Farm fall short as literature, they have still been unbelievably successful from a political point of view. Orwell's capacity as a writer has to be given some credit for that. Otherwise it's like evaluating a writer of comedy and ignoring whether he makes people laugh.
Yeah, but that doesn't defeat the point that his books are really boring and not especially well-written. Which was pretty much what I was saying. The politics of his novels are interesting, but nothing else is, which really ruins my enjoyment of them.
I think I only half agree with that. So far as the actual prose is concerned, his books are wonderfully written, especially Animal Farm. Prose was Orwell's greatest talent, and his style of writing has dated incredibly slowly. But at the same time, I can see why someone might think that his kind of prose, wonderful though it is, is more suitable for non-fiction than for novels. (Now, if it's actually his plots you dislike, or his characterization, or something purely novelistic like that, I can't argue with you there.)Yeah, but that doesn't defeat the point that his books are really boring and not especially well-written.
I think I only half agree with that. So far as the actual prose is concerned, his books are wonderfully written, especially Animal Farm. Prose was Orwell's greatest talent, and his style of writing has dated incredibly slowly. But at the same time, I can see why someone might think that his kind of prose, wonderful though it is, is more suitable for non-fiction than for novels. (Now, if it's actually his plots you dislike, or his characterization, or something purely novelistic like that, I can't argue with you there.)