___urnamz2longfixit___
Banned
Re: Cosmo Forums
:(
People offended by that title really really shouldn't be on the internet. Which thread did I mention again? Whichever one it was the 'take our words to heart' sentiment echoes on.
???
MusicDragon turned the thread into a superiority competition about intelligence. I don't know what King's thread was - something about communism probably. Would've been worth a shot though.
Right, except we'd clearly be looked down upon because we're the outcasts advertising a forum and... c'mon, any mod in their right mind would close the thread and end the matter.
But it's Vixie's attitude in general, opal! You and I; Spaekle and I could both have civil conversations. Vixie posts with a condescending holier-than-thou attitude and that's just uncalled for.
It wasn't weak criticism; if that's criticism, jeez the standards of this forum have fallen in the last few months. It was ganging up by my book; especially when Walker's an idiot who can't respond to anyone.
I don't even know who Diplomatic is/what members on our forum expressed an interest in caring.
I'm down for that when Vixie apologises to Faltzer and co. for being mean.
Sorry to disappoint.
:(
Perhaps you should stop treating the forum as a single unit. Some people are offended by a PM with that title. Some people are also offended by the thread you mentioned.
Yup, perhaps some of our members overreacted. Negrek already dealt with that, I think. Keyword: some.
People offended by that title really really shouldn't be on the internet. Which thread did I mention again? Whichever one it was the 'take our words to heart' sentiment echoes on.
You did start this. And MusicDragon reacted quite naturally to someone who clearly seemed like a troll (perhaps Ruby shouldn't have deleted King's threads in Serious Business). Again, though: you're talking about only a few members! Someone could have PMed a moderator and got them to intervene, if necessary.
???
MusicDragon turned the thread into a superiority competition about intelligence. I don't know what King's thread was - something about communism probably. Would've been worth a shot though.
Right, except we'd clearly be looked down upon because we're the outcasts advertising a forum and... c'mon, any mod in their right mind would close the thread and end the matter.
Vixie made a mistake! It happens. Chill.
But it's Vixie's attitude in general, opal! You and I; Spaekle and I could both have civil conversations. Vixie posts with a condescending holier-than-thou attitude and that's just uncalled for.
I'm sorry but you are wildly overreacting. Two people - both recipients of said PMs - dismissed the thread offhand, quite justifiable, and a few more offered criticism. Weak criticism, perhaps, but criticism. Is that "ganging up"?
It wasn't weak criticism; if that's criticism, jeez the standards of this forum have fallen in the last few months. It was ganging up by my book; especially when Walker's an idiot who can't respond to anyone.
Your forum appears to care! Just wanted to clear up why Diplomatic was banned.
I don't even know who Diplomatic is/what members on our forum expressed an interest in caring.
Now, can we agree that this was all a product of overreaction and misunderstanding and just lay the matter to rest?
I'm down for that when Vixie apologises to Faltzer and co. for being mean.