Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
I can believe this, but I honestly dont think pokemon should be judged by their looks.
Newsflash:
Alot of people do. It's kind of silly. But that's how the world works.
Really? I think it's sillier to judge Pokemon on their stats. It makes me sad when people boil Pokemon down to numbers and values and disregard lots of Pokemon entirely because they're not good competitive battlers. "Truly skilled trainers should try to win with their favourites" and all that.
Really? I think it's sillier to judge Pokemon on their stats. It makes me sad when people boil Pokemon down to numbers and values and disregard lots of Pokemon entirely because they're not good competitive battlers. "Truly skilled trainers should try to win with their favourites" and all that.
But I like Pikachu best because it's cute, so.
Really? I think it's sillier to judge Pokemon on their stats. It makes me sad when people boil Pokemon down to numbers and values and disregard lots of Pokemon entirely because they're not good competitive battlers. "Truly skilled trainers should try to win with their favourites" and all that.
clearly, what really matters is the movepool. obviously.
Well, Farfetch wouldn't suck if he had the moves of Staravia or Pigeot.
Smeargle knows all the moves and it still sucks.
Underrated? ... I'd say Dark.