Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
I mean, where there's not information, there's always behavior. Like being in a hurry to no-lynch just because no one's come forward with something yet, hmmm?
As common as D1 abstains are around these parts, every abstain is a missed opportunity to lynch mafia, let's not forget.
But in a random lynch there is a better chance of accidentally killing an innocent than actually killing mafai.
Nope, nothing to add here yet. Do we have to vote for someone, or can we choose not to vote for anyone tonight?
Yeah, that's more or less what I meant. I'm not opposed to no-lynching per se, but I don't really see the logic of "no activity, no info -> abstain", specially when it's around the middle of the phase length. It honestly strikes me as being in a hurry to abstain (although I don't mean that that's necessarily scum behavior as opposed to a player vice), and I don't think it accomplishes a lot more than making things complicated for people if they do decide towards lynching farther down the line.(I mean, I dunno, I guess it helps balance out any votes that do actually occur in the event that those votes roll in toward the end of the day and you don't have a chance to post your opinion then, but eh. Aside from it looking a little like an attempt to stifle discussion, I've just never really seen the point in being so gung-ho to abstain, especially not during a relatively lengthy day phase.)
I'm just nitpicking, but I think the way most GMs do it isn't per se "50% living players are mafia -> mafia win"; it requires a situation where literally nothing can stop the mafia from controlling the day vote and landing night kills in impunity. So, like, 50% mafia players wouldn't be a win if the vigilante is alive, since he can still kill mafia. (basically, the whole thing is an artifice to "the actual mafia win condition is killing all Town players, but we're not going to bother playing it out if we have a situation where any other outcome is now impossible")In any case, though, the mafia's already won if the numerical odds of lynching mafia ever get above 1/2, so that argument is always going to lead to abstaining.)
For what it's worth, everyone who's posted relatively frequently is coming across as genuine to me - right now, I'm reading ILS/Cynder more as cautious/resigned townies than scum trying to prevent a lynch, especially given ILS's was the first vote of the day, and similarly MF/Eifie/Kratos seem more like town who want discussion rather than mafia who want a mislynch. (By the way, Cynder, I'm not sure where you're getting the 40% from, as 4/12 is closer to 30%? In any case, though, the mafia's already won if the numerical odds of lynching mafia ever get above 1/2, so that argument is always going to lead to abstaining.) I'm more skeptical of Gzhoom's commentary-less vote, although I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt because he's only been in one game here before.
And there we go, Negrek is definitely not me. Transparent GMing??? What the fFor the record, in this game the Mafia win when they outnumber the Town players, not when they tie or some other permutation.
Seventy-hours for discussion.
lol, typo. It's seventy-two hours.Also, Negrek, is this a typo for seventy-two or do we only have 70 hours?