• Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.

    Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.

    Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?

What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

Thorne

Thorne

It's feeding time
What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

yeah. pretty much what the title says, also, also try saying what stat changes should be.

I personally think ABSOL needs a evolution AND pre-evolution, it looks like a first evolution. Since Absol have so high attack stat it should either lower it and get more of the other stats or get more attack but less in the other stats.

What's your opinions?
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

I disagree with you; Absol is one of the best standalone Pokemon, and an evolution/pre-evolution would likely not fit it.
I think most of the Pokemon are fine how they are. The new evolutions and such are getting ridiculous, sorry, Probopass.
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

Blastoise428 said:
Maybe Tropius should get a prevo... Or Rotom...
Click to expand...
Well, a Tropius pre-evolution might be cute, but then again... I don't like this idea, either. I think some Pokemon, Tropius included, are better off by themselves.
I don't know about Rotom, though.
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

Baby Absol would be adorable. ^_^

Otherwise, though, most of the 'big' basics should be left without evolutionary lines.
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

An evolution of Heracross would be nice in my opinion, because it'd be a big scary bug. And a evo for male Buneary, since seeing a male Lopunny would be strange. A pre-evo for Carnivine would be cute, and an evolution for Chatot would be graceful(think a swan-parrot).
My friend Avery made an evolution for Girafarig called Gazellzag, with was powerful, yet graceful also.
And finally, an evo for Pachirisu would be energetic and powerful, yet cute and fluffy.
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

I personally think ABSOL needs a evolution AND pre-evolution, it looks like a first evolution. Since Absol have so high attack stat it should either lower it and get more of the other stats or get more attack but less in the other stats.
Click to expand...

Nononono! Absol is one of the best standalone pokemon like Lapras, Seviper and Girafarig. If Absol needed any evolutions, it would have them already. Please just leave the good ones alone.

Although I think they should kill off Rhyperior and give Rhyhorn a pre-evolution. Also Kangaskhan should get one because it's already alluded to with the Kangaskhan joeys.


What's so weird about male Lopunny? It's not as if they have boobs or anything and they're not that feminine. I don't think it's in the same situation as male Gardevoir were.
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

Fafetch'd needs an evolution. A Samurai Duck would be awesome, ESPECIALLY if it had high attack and speed
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

A baby Absol would be cute, not saying I want one, I just want to see a cute Absol like picture for once.

Luvdisc REALLY needs an evolution to suck less.

So does Delibird.
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

I think female Lopunny are pretty; males are handsome.

Kangaskhan prevo for the win! The little purple one should be it...
 
Last edited:
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

EeveeSkitty said:
No, it doesn't. As said before it's one of those stand alone Pokemon that have good stats etc...and no Pokemon NEEDS a pre evo or evo, it would just be better.
Click to expand...

Okay well then it'd be a good candidate for one. I like pre evos, they tend to be cute, and a laprus pre evo would, I imagine, be cuter that a full grown one.
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

Well I suppose everyone got their opinions about Absol evolutions :sweatdrop:
There might be a point, Absol is a awesome stand-alone, but after all:
Baby Absol: Adorable.
Absol: win.
evolved Absol: more win.



Luvsick needs a evolution, I could imagine a Chimecho evolution too, and Delibird, and male Buneary's need a evolution so bad, I could see male Combee's evolving into a knight-bee, or something like that. :grin:
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

It isn't about if they look good or if it seems cool. It's if they would be any use.
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

Farfetch'd should evolve into a Fighting/Flying duck with leek-chuks
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

^ Awesome, Farfetch'd needs the stats and type to put itself apart from the other Normal/Flying.
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

Baby Absol: Adorable.
Absol: win.
evolved Absol: more win.
Click to expand...

Not at all neccesarily. They gave Chansey an ugly, pretty much useless pre-evolution and they gave Rhydon a hideous evolution (which was again unneccesary). Aesthetically, sure it might be nice to think about or make up, but they aren't going to make them the way that you particularly want and it will probably ruin an already great pokemon.

Besides, there's nothing wrong with standalone pokemon. I just figured Rhyperior was stupid and Kangaskhan pretty much has a pre-evo anyway (they just haven't called it a seperate pokemon yet).

It's the same with Lapras. If they did it, it would probably suck.

I can understand for already sucky pokemon though - like Farfetch'd (leek nunchucks for the win) or Luvdisc.

Also I hate it how they keep making up evolution methods. Why can't they just use the old ones. >:|
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

ultraviolet said:
Not at all neccesarily. They gave Chansey an ugly, pretty much useless pre-evolution and they gave Rhydon a hideous evolution (which was again unneccesary). Aesthetically, sure it might be nice to think about or make up, but they aren't going to make them the way that you particularly want and it will probably ruin an already great pokemon.

Besides, there's nothing wrong with standalone pokemon. I just figured Rhyperior was stupid and Kangaskhan pretty much has a pre-evo anyway (they just haven't called it a seperate pokemon yet).

It's the same with Lapras. If they did it, it would probably suck.

I can understand for already sucky pokemon though - like Farfetch'd (leek nunchucks for the win) or Luvdisc.

Also I hate it how they keep making up evolution methods. Why can't they just use the old ones. >:|
Click to expand...

the only evolution method I think is annoying is trading, since I have no friend with a pokémon game, or a wifi connector.
 
Re: What pokémon SHOULD get a evolution/pre-evolution?

Delibird would be better off with an evolution, I think.

But if Farfetch'd is given an evolution or a pre-evolution, I will boycott the Pokémon franchise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom