EvilCrazyMonkey
will be the prettiest little girl since Zac Efron.
ECM: Sarcasm....xD But you are acting...odd...maybe it's because you're smart. Ok, I'll shut up now.
Have you not seen me outside of this thread?
Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
ECM: Sarcasm....xD But you are acting...odd...maybe it's because you're smart. Ok, I'll shut up now.
Well....I always do jump on bandwagons....I'm just stupid and i stink at this game. I'm always the innocent that gets slaughtered at the beginning of every mafia game. -_-Hmm, I'm beginning to become mildly suspicious of Flareth. She seems to be jumping on the bandwagon and all for accusing someone.
Here's a thought:
She and Icalasari are mafia.
Why else would she defend Icalasari as a "friend"? Either she's fooling or she knows something. This will probably never be seconded because of my failed attempt at turbler, but anyways...
I nominate Flareth.
Why does this make truly random nominations better? We could very well be taking out a good innocent, also.
If we test everyone that lives up to their names, then we wouldn't have time to actually nominate someone. That is, if we keep taking back nominations for those who defend themselves.
We could also both be wrong. But it's better to work off of a lead then to not.
We have a better chance of not killing a good innocent if we take out the ones that don't even talk. And plus, they could also be Mafia laying low, which is probably likely if we have no leads to go from, which is again the only really good time to do random (or should I say psuedorandom to please you?) nominations.We could very well be taking out a good innocent, yes. Does the potential risk outweigh the potential reward? I don’t know.
They are still random; they simply have exclusions.Um… that’s not what I meant. I meant that if some people are excluded from random nominations, then the nominations aren’t really random. I was mostly just arguing semantics there, not really making a point.
Then don't vote.That’s true. But like I said, I don’t really see either of your arguments as providing good leads.