It really is harmful, though. Otherkin, especially in social justice-y places like Tumblr, are generally SAWCSMs (or are, at the very least,
very privileged people) who like to compare their plight and struggle to those of trans* people. Otherkin who take terms from the trans* community absolutely need to be called out.
This is a good blog from an ex-otherkin who explains why people do this and why it's bad.
I agree that merely
identifying as otherkin is not problematic. There are weirder things to think than "I am a cat," and I doubt anybody is going to be able to convince them otherwise, so I just leave it alone.
I really think that's a separate issue. Otherkin in itself is not inherently harmful. It is possible people group to it for reasons. Not the same thing, though, and honestly if someone's a jerk... idc if they're otherkin or not, so.
That is fair! However, no one's asking you to immediately trust the cis community, but more simply to not get defensive and angry when they haven't expressed any outright anti-trans* sentiments!
I suppose you have a point! However cis people are not the ones seeking rights right now, that would be the trans* community! And while no one's asking you to be sweet as honey to every cis person you meet, I personally am asking if the blanket generalizations and angry reactions against cis people trying to understand the trans* community could be toned down some!
It seems like the most appropriate place to ask, honestly. I mean, it is already a discussion about trans* people being held by trans* people, if a cis reader has a question about something a trans* person states why not add to the discussion?
I'm going to put this as simply as I can. Trans* issues are
not about you. You have to take yourself out of the argument. When someone says 'cis people' and you get offended, you are making a trans* discussion about cis people, about
you.
If you are not a bad person, you really don't have to go on tirades about it. Just act like a nice person and I'm sure we'll all realize hey, you're a nice person.
Honestly, I don't even know what statement has got you so offended. Iirc no one even said anything negative about cis people. It honestly feels like all the cis people here are just angry that we might think they're mean so you have to yell until we'll say ok, you're the
good cis people. How about... you just... act nice??? Or do you really think this is a case of anti-cis bigotry in which we think
all cis people are assholes so by default no matter how you act you are an asshole?
"That is fair! However, no one's asking you to immediately trust the cis community, but more simply to not get defensive and angry when they haven't expressed any outright anti-trans* sentiments!"
How about you consider the fact that we're getting defensive because you
have stated things that are anti-trans*? It seems to me like you'd prefer to be considered 'good' than to actually think about if you're being anti-trans* or not.
EDIT: People here post very fast. Huh.
My entire point is that ... evidently does not want to become a bigot. She was asking questions and trying to learn. If someone offends you unintentionally, just explain why you were offended and give them an opportunity to learn from the experience, then kick their ass if they don't.
I am not saying that it's okay to use a transparent veneer of politesse to disguise vile prejudices. It's not about you having to earn anything, it's about having to teach other people what hurts you because they genuinely don't know.
Generally people offend me so often that I literally have run out of fucks to explain to each and every one why they are being offensive. Imagine if every time someone spoke to you they could not get away without saying something offensive. Your family, your friends, strangers online. It seems like the world rejoices in offending you. Would you
really, after your entire life of this, still be explaining patiently how they're being offensive? I mean, if you would be, congrats, you've got more patience than me.
No, but you should at least be given the benefit of the doubt.
I am not asking you to adore or worship anyone; I'm asking you to recognize when a person is just ignorant as opposed to an actual asshole. If somebody says terribly offensive things because they honestly don't know any better, just explain to them what they're doing wrong and why, and hopefully they'll change. If they don't care even after you've told them what offends you and why, then they really are assholes, but at least give them that opportunity to prove otherwise. How can you blame someone for offending you when they honestly had no idea what they were doing wrong?
I give everyone the benefit of the doubt and if they change or prove that I was misjudging them I change my opinion of them. I also don't much care if someone is ignorant or an actual asshole, I only care how they act. Ignorance can lead to just as much bigotry.
I don't
have to, or care, about blaming them. As I said, if they actually change, great. Most of the time, it seems like people just don't care about learning, and that includes the people here.