Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
now this is the kind of tinfoil i can get behindwhat are the odds that mr. ultracool is the third party mist is talking about, and wins if he gets x number of visitors in a night? what if he kills all of those visitors :O
this tinfoil would also go against ur tarot cards, which as we all know are the premier reads in this gamemy koko/uc w/w tinfoil is way worse and if you ask me about it in the morning/afternoon tomorrow i will likely be embarassed to admit it but in the interest of Honesty, i wanted to announce it
i think this interaction was fine, tbh? later seshas points it out as hedging but like ... i think that sort of is a weird thing to shade herbe for here because i think that this reaction is almost perfectly NAI in my mind (mafia and town alike would react sort of similarly to outgroup talk, i think, except that mafia might want to do it more subtly?) and i think in the world where herbe and mist are both mafia, and herbe wanted to lend some sort of credence or strength to mist's post, he doesn't do it in this way (where he like, gives a long reason why mist's post should be taken with a grain of salt - before offhandedly saying "but i bought it in the moment")i don't think that that would be hard to lie about (its hard to prove the absence of a third party cause they dont usually self reveal anyway?) but inherently i trusted them abt itDo you think Mist is telling the truth?damn will is lying again? parking my vote tbh
this makes me think mist and herbe not w/w, immediately responding to a partner's post by wifom-ing it feels loosely unlikelygod imagine the 4d chess if mist was somehow setting up some elaborate mafia gamble hinging on town believing there's outgroup scum/third party bad boys
responding to mist claiming to know of 3p/outgroup by checking to see if it fits into the setup constraints feels like, fine to me tbh and i am kind of surprised to see some shading based on this post considering that i've gotten TRed for saying "so there are probably ___ number of wolves in this game, right?" multiple times beforeRight so we have uhhh 18 players if I'm counting right? So assuming like a fifth to a third (ish) are scum, that's like 4-6ish, so if Mist's info is correct then that sounds like an ingroup of like 3-5 and at least one outgroup? Seems plausible imo
agree with this for now but i need to revisit mistposting at a later time tbh because i keep getting glossyeyed over it right now; dominant thought is that i don't gutread it as grounds for a SR, and also that i am bad at/dislike reading mist tbh so i'm going to just put a pin in this for laterI didn't interpret Mist's initial reveal as a joke, just as a slightly ambiguous phrasing that they quickly clarified. I think it would be completely in character as a signal from an ingroup mafia who's trying to signal to an outgroup. Which is not to say that that's my working theory right now - I think it probably makes more sense for mafia!Mist to signal more subtly, regardless of whether they're ingroup or not - but I don't think it's much less likely than the opposite.
realized that this was based on an anachronism tbh, the kokoshade i was referring to didn't happen until like 10 posts after jack's listthought about this while looking at jack's readlist in 172 - i've thought that seshas/koko have been a bit shade-throwy this game, but he seems to react a bit differently to the two? i personally think that it's a bit more within koko's townmeta to be paranoid in the way that e has been here, but seshas is now confusing me a bit/feeling out of her town meta even though i mentioned before that i liked that her solviness remains.
ah, interesting. i think i'm mostly fixated on the fact that he's breaking his meta tbh and i think that that change is more likely to be town wanting to shift approaches than a wolf (where coasting would be more optimal)Also, for the record, I went back and looked at the Cats scum chat and Mr. Ultracool did have somewhat of a focus on items (e.g. suggested claiming scummate Rari's neighborizer powers as coming from an item.)
i think that i'll have a better time once i'm able to actually do realtime posting tbh because i really just hate catching up and having to imagine/piece together what the inthread climate was at a given point of time instead of just. being there when it happens. lmaowas thinking more about keldeo asking me how i could get to a more "head full" position wrt this game, and i think the climate just feels distinctly different from tvt/cats to me. like, significantly more aggressive (memephase ended a lot earlier ...) and more direct talk of lynching, overt FoSes on d1. i ... get easily stressed out ingame and combat that by staying super on top of the thread, so not being able to do that this weekend due to holiday stuff combined with the sort of unfamiliar environment is making me feel really out of my element atm ;(