Ether's Bane
future Singaporean
- Pronoun
- he
...you know, this thread is actually pretty hilarious.
"It seems we have reached an impasse." - Patrick Star
Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
...you know, this thread is actually pretty hilarious.
It's funny because everyone's immediate response upon seeing this thread seemed to be "MUST USE NON-SECULAR TERMINOLOGY". And obscure non-secular terminology at that.
I just don't get the reasoning behind using BCE/CE?? Using them doesn't make your arguments inherently Christian.
So what's the logic behind it? "Oh no, if I don't use the obscure non-secular term when referring to the date, the Pope will incept himself into my mind and make me die from internal hemorrhaging!!!"?
And obscure non-secular terminology at that.
You have your terminology mixed up - BCE/CE is secular, BC/AD isn't.
why did i not remember that asdfndsfndsifdoaodmaiosdmiadasdsfgh
Outside of serious academic papers I don't think I've seen anyone use the terms before... I understand you're not Christian but this is pretty inconsequential.
If you feel it's inconsequential, why does it matter enough that you're so bothered?
why did i not remember that asdfndsfndsifdoaodmaiosdmiadasdsfgh
Outside of serious academic papers I don't think I've seen anyone use the terms before... I understand you're not Christian but this is pretty inconsequential.
I'm not...? I don't know where everyone got the idea that I'm bothered by usage of the terms, I just find it kind of silly!
The fact that you haven't seen BCE/CE used is a sign of a flaw in your education, not of a lack of use in the modern world.
(3) Quite apart from the social, religious and cultural implications of BC/AD, it is simply ludicrous to use it as a scale when some sources have Christ's estimated birth years before and after the year he was supposedly born on the BC/AD scale. Using a scale based on an uncertain date is pretty ridiculous.
Wikipedia said:Both the BCE/CE and BC/AD notations are based on a sixth-century estimate for the year in which Jesus was conceived or born, with the common era designation originating among Christians in Europe at least as early as 1615 (at first in Latin).
Eh? Before Common Era and Common Era makes perfect sense.
Just want to pop in and say that AD means "anno domini" meaning "in the year of the lord" as opposed to "our".
And just because Karkat is 13 doesn't mean he can't find something silly, validly. Using age as a counter-argument is a pretty poor debating tactic, if you ask me.
Or maybe it's because most Americans use BC/AD?
Um... before you dig your hole even deeper, BCE/CE is based on the exact same timeframe as BC/AD. Do a little research.
This whole discussion about BCE/CE being somehow superior to BC/AD is, frankly, ridiculous. They both (originally) had religious meaning and they both use the birth of Jesus as their era maker. The only difference is one uses Jesus explicitly. If the goal is to remove every trace of religion from our year-numbering systems, we sure as hell aren't there yet.
I've encountered the terminology before; it's just that here in the States it's nowhere near as commonly used as BC/AD.
Come to think of it, AD/CE are just really redundant terms in general; I never use either when referring to the year and unless you're referring to events that occurred prior to 1 AD it's pointless to include them period. Why do we even use them?
I am referring to the fact that 1 CE is not more "common" than 1 BCE whereas 1 AD and 1BC are distinguished by the appearance of Jesus (although I don't actually believe it is still a difference).
Because when we do need to distinguish, we need something! Do you not think this might be partly why you probably haven't seen BCE/CE much outside academic texts - because, like you say, there isn't much need to use them anyway? There are a lot more dates in academic texts than in daily conversation. :D