Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
The media =/= everyone. I think that rich idiots who end up paying less taxes than everyone else are just as bad as this rather foolish woman.Plenty of people do far more stupid things than have the audacity to have many children, but the media don't attack them; young, poor, single mothers so often have to bear the brunt of the judgemental media
The point is that she's unlikely to be able to care for all of them. A lone woman looking after fourteen children simultaneously doesn't sound like it'll work out.If she can take care of all of them, then there really isn't any valid reason why she shouldn't have them. :/
she had eight babbies, not sixShe expected most of them, actually: she asked for the doctor to implant all six embryos. :| There's also little chance of her accidentally conceiving: she's single and has been for a while.
That's not the point. She already had six children within the space of a few years, which in my opinion is a bad decision anyway, and having yet another would be just as foolish as having eight more. Well, okay, so maybe one would be less wrong than eight, but that's like saying that stealing one loaf of bread is better than stealing eight.Well, did she mean to give birth to six babies?