The Vendetta Thread

[Alexi]

^Why is this?

 

[Dannichu]

Eh, I kind of agree. I think "everyone is somewhere on Kinsey's scale", where there are some people at the extreme ends who are exclusively attracted to one gender, is a bit more accurate.

 

[Koori Renchuu]

My idiot bosses! They need to get hurt in some way for what they put me through.

 

[surskitty]

Eh, I kind of agree. I think "everyone is somewhere on Kinsey's scale", where there are some people at the extreme ends who are exclusively attracted to one gender, is a bit more accurate.

I think I fell off the Kinsey scale.

 

[Zuu]

~ People who act smart in class but end up making fools of themselves... but of course, no one notices except me
~ moar later

 

[Time Psyduck]

^Why is this?

1) Not everyone is even sexual
2) Calling everyone bisexual means that bisexual isn't useful in any way, and you have to define people who are significantly attracted to both as something else
3) If you want to argue the point, surely everyone being pansexual is more accurate, and some of those only like 'normal' men and women
4) Enjoyment of sexual actions (eg sex) =/= sexual attraction.
5) Just because you see someone's actions as sexual doesn't mean they do.

Eh, I kind of agree. I think "everyone is somewhere on Kinsey's scale", where there are some people at the extreme ends who are exclusively attracted to one gender, is a bit more accurate.

I think I fell off the Kinsey scale.

So did I

 

[Vladimir Putin's LJ]

That is where you are wrong, you see! For the Kinsey scale has seven levels, 0-6 being heterosexual-homosexual and 7 being asexual!

 

[Time Psyduck]

Asexuals are officially classed as x on the Kinsey scale, so what actually happened was we were kicked off into a little isolated category.
Now I'm gaining a vendetta against Kinsey sexologists who ignore asexuality.
And anyone who thinks I don't exist.