foreign contaminant
"tray ben," what's that mean?
Anyone read Jonathan Livingston Seagull?
i loved it. it was a great book. i think i'd like it more now than i did when i read it two years ago.
Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
Anyone read Jonathan Livingston Seagull?
so after A Clockwork Orange I moved onto Ursula le Guin's The Left Hand of Darkness, which definitely lives up to le Guin's impressive high standards. it's about a race of hermaphrodite humans living on a planet in an ice age and their first contact with wider mankind. it's also got incest and homosexual undertones and somewhat implied futa.it's also a fascinating exploration of a society which lacks the very concept of gender or ever-present sexual desire.
@opal: incest, aye. Estraven has sex with his brother and they have a child called Sorve who gets a few lines in the last chapter. the futa was just me being silly. :P[this is opal, the forums are broken and I can't log in]
There was incest? I don't seem to remember that. And it strikes me you are somewhat missing the point in talking about futa. Also, it might interest you to know that Le Guin said one of the things she most regretted about that book was the lack of actual homosexuality. What else have you read by her? (she is my entire family's favourite author. I wrote a 4000 word paper on her last year. :D)
@opal: incest, aye. Estraven has sex with his brother and they have a child called Sorve who gets a few lines in the last chapter.
I've also read The Dispossessed which is honestly to god one of my favourite books ever. and the first two novels of the Earthsea series. so I probably don't have anywhere near the same credentials as your family, but I still think she's a great author. what was your paper about, generally?
I'll definitely get round to it. I just found the change in style between the first and second books a little jarring. The first was wild adventures across the whole of Earthsea and the second felt more like a segment of a whole story.The Dispossessed is amazing, yes. I think my favourite books are The Left Hand of Darkness and The Farthest Shore, which is Earthsea book three.
That sounds pretty cool. :oIt was titled "The treatment of gender in Ursula K Le Guin's The Left Hand of Darkness", which is terribly general, I know, but I don't have the academic knowledge for a more in-depth paper, and hey, this was high school.
That sounds pretty cool. :o
I'm amazed that your teacher allowed it though.
That sounds pretty cool. :o
I'm amazed that your teacher allowed it though.
because in my experience, even if English teachers let you do something creative, they still expect you to do 'literary' stuff. le Guin is brilliant but I dunno if what she writes qualifies for lit fic.Why? o.o
because in my experience, even if English teachers let you do something creative, they still expect you to do 'literary' stuff. le Guin is brilliant but I dunno if what she writes qualifies for lit fic.
see also ditto's post.
Well, most highschools =/= non-heterosexual anythings
well she's still not regarded as canon. like, dickens, joyce, fitzgerald, all those types are agreed upon as lit fic, but sf is kinda excluded unless the author actively discourages the label. it's dumb, but that's just the way things roll.Notwithstanding the absurdity of the term 'lit fic', of course Le Guin qualifies. Clearly your English teachers have been sub-par.
I think you might be misinterpreting Ditto's (admittedly poorly-worded) post. he probably meant that high school communities do not generally approve of non-hetero sexuality, especially within the context of academic study. which seems to be a fair assessment.That's not true and you know it.
also, with all due respect, I find that comment quite insulting. my English teachers over the past few years have been some of the most intelligent, committed individuals that I've ever met. :/
I agree that the attitude is stupid. but the problem is that it's held by the majority. even the teachers who included Frankenstein on the syllabus probably didn't think of it as science fiction, even though it arguably follows many sf tropes.My apologies. I'm just vastly annoyed by the "science fiction isn't real literature" mentality.