not as much as when I see you looking at it when it's your turn to command tbh
-
Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
-
A+ much improved
Woobat definitely could work too. Golett... ech, that one's less "derp" and more "were you expecting dexterity or understanding of modern items from an ancient hunkering mass of golem".
Maybe something with Klutz? Off the top of my head, there's Buneary who can only evolve when it's been loved for once.
Please, you don't even have 50 of them yet.
Well, let's see... cries a lot, has parental issues, likes to wave a stick around... I'm thinking Cubone.
I've actually considered buying a few Pokémon to put AAI2 names on, but, I already have what's probably the largest AAmon squad in ASB since Sangfroidish lost his.
I can sound fake fluent in Japanese but that's not the point-
the word efficacy sort of begins the same way, and it means the ability to make something you want happen happen, and so for some reason thinking of you and the sigs being implemented helped with the remembering and it was actually on the quiz and yes thank
Cute!!!
(also, how exactly would Float get surgery to have its specs fit, anyway? edit: While looking for a picture of a two-eyed Unown, I found this)
(also also, your swap was imperfect)
I remember that time and it just sounds like an objectively bad thing to have gotten yourself into
ahhh it feels so good to be caught up on reffings again
your name helped me on my vocab test--
that's not creepy/odd at all is it--
I logged into GPX at work just now to feed it a berry and help you out but a) it's not in your party so boooooo but more importantly b) your activity feed says you already finished the task so woohoo
wow this is fugly
I thought you would have figured out by now that anyone looking at WHAT'S YOUR ASTROLOGICAL SIGN is probably looking at my scale, haha. (edit: but not any more)
(no unless you want, like, a month between reffings)
on the one hand, two rounds seems too short and doesn't seem like it puts much of a stumbling block in front of a serene grace attacker; on the other hand, three rounds seems like it might be a bit much and takes away a legitimate strategic option? decisions, decisions...
fwiw, if it affects the length of persistence at all, I'm having each flinch cut the subsequent flinch rate by 10%, and the dunsparce in question has spammed an effectively 60% flinch rate move (after serene grace is taken into effect) for most of two whole rounds including the one I'm reffing now, and has successfully caused three flinches by the end of the round I'm reffing even with the declining rate
total change of subject: minor reffing question for you!
so in lotf vs. lilycolo, I'm temporarily lowering the flinch rate after somebody flinches so as to avoid overrepetitive flinches. how long do you think is reasonable for this lowered rate to persist? I'm kind of leaning toward either two or three rounds but I'm second-guessing myself and I wanted to pick your brain before deciding for sure
!
bashing blocks literally gives rhyhorn a hangover
I legitimately don't know which of your sets of commands I would find more unpleasant
(gdi posted on my own wall again... this seems especially common when I'm browsing tcod on my phone) -
Loading…
-
Loading…