Harlequin
Active member
I'm trying to learn as much British foreign policy (1878 - 1914) as I can before nine am tomorrow, and I'm condensing my notes, and I realised I do something a bit weird. Here's an example:
I was just wondering if anyone else does this. Like, make countries and events into people etc. It makes it much easier for me to learn.
- [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Eastern Roumelia + Bulgaria = breach in Berlin Settlement. Russia wanted to give Eastern Roumelia back to Turkey. Russia kidnapped Bulgaria's king, Bulgaria chose anti-Russian Ferdinand.[/FONT]
- [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]France + Germany = MUTUAL DISLIKE. France wanted Alsace-Lorraine back. Germany and her triple alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy) were like “Britain should totally not be friends with France” so that France was all “lol I am alone “. Salisbury tried to influence the Triple Alliance to curb Russian designs on the Balkans.[/FONT]
- [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Salisbury supported Germany and Austria-Hungary when they opposed Russian demands for the return of Eastern Roumelia to Turkey, and also the removal of King Ferdinand. The Russians were like ““ but accepted it anyway.[/FONT]
- [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Salisbury was like “k” when Italy was like “sign a Mediterranean Agreement” that would maintain the status quo in the Aegean, Adriatic and Black Seas. Italy would help British interests in Egypt and the Navy was all “FUCK FRANCE (in the event of an unprovoked attack)”. Austra-Hungary signed this, too. Bismarck was like “hell yeah” and unofficially promised to support British interests in Egypt.[/FONT]
- [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]1889 Bismarck was like “ALLIANCE PLZ” but Salisbury was like “k, only if you help us if Russia is aggressive “ and Bismarck was like “sry but Russia's my friend too”, so Salisbury was like “D:” and rejected the alliance. Still, relations were all cool until 1894, after Caprivi was out of power.[/FONT]