Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
Me, personally? Rule utilitarianism.
You raise a valid point and I appreciate you pointing out my failings as a parent. Practising a system of ethics based on the promise of a reward, in your case an afterlife, is certainly preferable to practising a system of ethics based on it simply being the right thing to do.
Golden rule. Don't do something to somebody else you wouldn't want them to do to you.
Okay. Morality in a nutshell. Don't hurt people if you can avoid it. Don't steal stuff unless you're starving or it's really, really important. Work hard. Pay your bills. Try to help others. Always double check your math if there are explosives involved. If you screwed up, you need to see it gets fixed. And don't eat anything that talks. If it doesn't fall under one of those categories, just do the best you can.
I'm an atheist, not a sociopath?
I make all ethical decisions based on the philosophy of rational egoism, that is that it is rational to pursue my own interests and always irrational not to. This basically means I do whatever benefits me the most in the long run, I believe every action taken should have long term benefits to me and that any other effects are irrelevant. This obviously does not mean I go around commiting crimes as that will cause others to treat me in a way which is not beneficial.
What if, say, you are put in a situation where either you die or the entire population of Shanghai dies (but no one else knows it is you who made this decision, so you won't be held responsible or put or death)? Would you see it as ethical to save yourself over all those people?
This obviously does not mean I go around commiting crimes as that will cause others to treat me in a way which is not beneficial.
So... the only reason you don't commit crime (all crime?) is because of that? Would you commit crimes if it could go unnoticed?
Yes because if I die I would have no perception or thought of the world, this means that from my perspective the entire world would have ceased to exist, therefore my death would have the effect of ending the world, which is bad.
But, uh, isn't that sort of dick-ish? And doesn't it defeat the entire point of ethical systems in the first place? If millions of people are willing to kill millions of others to save themselves and only themselves, can't the world just go to hell because of one person's selfishness?
Don't get me wrong - selfishness has its place, even in ethical systems, but I don't think an entire one should be based around it.