God daaamn buttons being broken. x_x
and this feeling is exactly the feeling Palestinians are feeling
No shit. However, I'm sure this isn't an incredible deduction,
perhaps they should find different land to own? Wtf is so great about Israel, really?
... how the fuck do you argue with complete apathy
Haha, I'm at least halfway apathetic towards... most of this. Then again, I'm a generally apathetic person.
But anyhow, how 'bout you don't.
Not quite, considering my next point "Obviously by this I don't mean what's going on right now, but what happened in the past. Key word being past". Since if Israel were destroyed, it would affect
now.
But, even if it is ironic, why is it okay to bitch about how sad the Hamas's life is but not what happened to the Jews?
no, excuse my language, but fuck that shit.
Just because you say "well you can just leave if you don't like us genociding your population" doesn't mean they actually can. Even if they can, why should they? Why should they back off and let you have what little they have left? For fuck's sake.
That's why I never said 'you can just leave'. Try reading more carefully next time.
Now, I'm not completely sure about this, but don't the Palestinians have the option of leaving?
See, to me it seems like I
asked if they had the
option of leaving. Hmm. That seems a tad different to 'lol gtfo my country', but perhaps that's just me. Or maybe you didn't even read my post.
Also, perhaps this was unclear, but I actually meant that about
before the war started. Like when they were just bombing us.
And why? Because their land sucks? What good has stubbornness ever brought? But you're right, it's better to die holding onto your land than leave and become peaceful. Land is, after all, sacred.
Ooooooooh.
--
Sorry but judging by Whivit's reaction, I can honestly say that he is worse than citizens of Nazi Germany.
LOL.
Just wondering if you actually read any of my posts.
Hell, you seem to think that what your country is doing is justified. How can Genocide ever be justified? The thing is, though, that the citizens in Nazi Germany didn't actually agree with the Genocide. They were just to afraid of speaking out against the government, whereas Whivit actually thinks that the Palistinians should be 'removed'.
Correction: not
all the citizens in Nazi Germany agreed with it. Some certainly did. Saying all of them didn't agree is just shoving 'em into a box; a country never shares just one opinion.
And, again, did you bother reading any of my posts, or just the quoted responses?
--
I have to say that before I read this thread I knew very little about this topic, but I'm glad that I've read it now. I didn't realize how many more people were being killed by the Israeli government than by Hamas. I think it's really awful what's going on, and I'm a bit horrified that my own government is backing Israel in all of this.
Seriously? Do some research
outside this thread, please. Just. Please.
And I really don't think that, "If they don't like being killed/oppressed, they can just leave!" is a very good argument. "Hey homosexuals and blacks, if you don't like us killing you why don't you just go live in another country?" That's about how ridiculous Whivit's argument sounds to me.
Not even responding to this anymore.
--
I think the key words here are "I would gladly leave", "to me, land is just land". A lot of people wouldn't feel that way, a lot of people wouldn't want to be forced out of where they live. And it's a bit ridiculous to say "well, if you don't like it you can leave". There's no reason why they should have to.
Which is why I said it that way. Obviously different people have different opinions. Thus, individuality. However I feel that living in a sucky place should at least make people
more willing to leave.
Also, I
never said 'if you don't like it you can just leave'. Do you people have dyslexia or something?
And they don't
have to, as far as I'm concerned, but a good reason for them to want to is that Israel doesn't want them there. And Israel is bigger. Just makes sense.
Then I'm curious, what does define a person? I feel like the only way to define a person is by their actions and statements. If not by those, then how?
A person is defined by their beliefs, their history and their personality. Their actions certainly help to define them but are not their entirety, nor even their base.
I do believe that someone just said that you are "worse than the citizens of Nazi Germany". (I don't agree at all, by the way. You seem rational and you've said that you definitely don't agree with what is being done, so.) I don't know you, maybe you're not bothered by that at all - I just know that I would be. Even if a random person said that I was racist, or anything, I'd be bothered. But maybe that's just me.
I guess most people would be... it just seems dumb to me. Getting worked up over something someone said, when you don't even know that person?
Honestly, though, names have very little affect on me even if they come from people I
do care about (which is... a very small amount, when I think about it). It's just the whole act of name calling is ridiculous. Think of it this way: the person you're 'insulting' is probably not what you're saying they are. Even if they are, name-calling is rather low, so you're in fact lowering yourself by doing so. So, while the person you tried to insult
shouldn't care about what you said, you have instead degraded yourself. ... That's how I see it, anyhow.
The fact that I don't care about what they say always leads to amusement if it's live. >>;
Sorry if I uh, lost my place somewhere. I blame it (again) on buttons being broken. Multiquooooooooote...