Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
Doesn't (normally...) involve physical exertion, so no, it's not a sport by definition. It doesn't have to be a sport to be competitive.
bear in mind that this is wikipedia, but wikipedia claims that "sport" isn't really well defined and often includes chess and go even though they're primarily mental.
my rationalization is that your brain is a physical part of you ... and you are ... improving that. yes
So would competitive Pokémon be a sport?
1) I would probably argue that chess is a much more strategically intensive than Pokémon*, and plus Pokémon has an element of chance/luck that should probably exclude something from being a sport, but
2) hell if enough people want to call it a sport I'm probably not going to try to stop them! :B
*but it does take a lot of strategy and I'm bad at Pokémon
ETA: strategy aside since that could be disputed, I think the element of chance thing is the biggest reason I wouldn't call it a sport
I dunno, shooting game or clay targets is usually considered a sport, and that probably has just as much physical exertion as chess.Doesn't (normally...) involve physical exertion, so no, it's not a sport by definition. It doesn't have to be a sport to be competitive.
I dunno, shooting game or clay targets is usually considered a sport, and that probably has just as much physical exertion as chess.
This is a bit of an exaggeration. Chess doesn't involve dexterity.I dunno, shooting game or clay targets is usually considered a sport, and that probably has just as much physical exertion as chess.
Butterfree said:This question is kind of like "Are video games art?"
lawn bowls? billards? RC car racing? pigeon racing?This is a bit of an exaggeration. Chess doesn't involve dexterity.
I have no idea what these are except billiards, and billiards requires a lot of dexterity. Chess really does not require anything from the physical end apart from actually moving the pieces which anyone can do. The skill part comes entirely from the head.lawn bowls? billards? RC car racing? pigeon racing?
lawn bowls requires rolling small balls a few meters across turf and trying to get your ball nearest to a different ball (which literally anyone can do; most of the time you're trying very hard not to roll your ball too far. it's often played by elderly people). RC car racing is... racing remote-controlled cars. Pigeon racing is letting pigeons go in one spot and timing their return to a coop. Also: fishing.I have no idea what these are except billiards, and billiards requires a lot of dexterity. Chess really does not require anything from the physical end apart from actually moving the pieces which anyone can do. The skill part comes entirely from the head.
lawn bowls requires rolling small balls a few meters across turf and trying to get your ball nearest to a different ball (which literally anyone can do; most of the time you're trying very hard not to roll your ball too far. it's often played by elderly people)
Roger Ebert thinks the interactivity of video games makes them not art, because art is a pure expression of the intent of the creator and can't be affected by the viewer, only interpreted. I wouldn't define it that way, but no, by that definition they clearly aren't "art".I don't agree with this analogy, but it could be my bias on this question speaking (in that video games are a mixed media artform, and that there is no acceptable reason why films can be art but not video games).