I don't understand what you're saying here. I was responding to "better stats = greater chance to win" by saying that there other uses for the technique than to get better stats; then here you appear to be saying, "yeah, but look, you can use it to get better stats!" I don't see how that follows. Yes, you can use it to get better stats, but that's not the only (and certainly not the easiest) thing to do with it.
The only other uses I could think of were manipulating stats for Hidden Power, which falls into better stats. I can't think of any other uses for this '
technique'. Again, if you could point some other uses out, that would be awesome.
It's annoying when people say "but there's more than just bla-bla.." - "well.. such as?"
So? This is another case of the process being separate from the people who use it. Whether or not you're worried about people using this to their advantage in wi-fi battles, that's on them, not the technique itself. It's analogous to someone who decides he/she wants to learn about EV training for BT purposes, then realizes that doing it for wi-fi battles would be a good idea, just at a higher level.
Is killing a bunch of pokemon for stats actually comparable to exploiting a RNG? We know fully well what EV's, IV's, and the RNG is.
There's nothing random about EV's, because we know what they are and that we
have to kill pokemon to get them.
Ok, now the IV's.. hey, what the heck? they're selected at complete random and I have no direct influence over them.. how strange...
I guess EV's don't bother me because they're stats that every pokemon is bound to get; where? well that's up to the person who trained them. IV's.. they're selected at random, sure you can bend a few strings to boost the probability of getting a favourable one, but to a certain degree.
I almost wish that they would remove IV's, and have the
Hidden Power determined by a complete different hexadecimal sequence.
Fine, but why do you feel it necessary to impose your idea of what is and is not fair on how other people choose to play their own games? If you don't want to face people who use this technique in battle, then just say that you don't, the same way that people request not to play hacks today. Whether or not you feel something something "should" be flawed--when it doesn't *have* to be from the standpoint of game mechanics--represents your own view of the way that the game should be played, but what does it matter to you whether other people conform to it?
Well 1. Because i'm stubborn as hell, and 2. Because I just think that more people should think in a similar manner.
The thing is,
I don't have a say, nor do I even know who uses this
technique. PBR throws me a random opponent, they could be running a full team of 31/31/31/31/31/31 pokemon. - and therefore, it matters a great deal to me. Because i'm
being fair, and versing an
unfair player. What's the fun in kicking people's asses, when you do so knowing that you're a complete loser who has
no skill, and has to exploit the in-game mechanics in order to gain an unfair advantage?
Victory at all costs? - Yeah, I guess a lot of people think differently than I do..
Everyone has their own views; even smogon has it's own lame view on "Hax". (which I
totally 100% disagree with). But whereas they
enforce the restrictions of luck-based items and moves, I simply
ask that people play the game in a more fair fair.