Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
I use BC. I've never used the term "AD/CE" at any point in my life and BC/BCE sound more or less identical, so...
It's because that one doesn't have a mythological connotation
It's because that one doesn't have a mythological connotation, whereas BC/AD obviously refers to Christianity
Not anymore, anyway.
The turning point between the two eras is still the birth of Jesus, so it's still religious.
And even then, they're so far removed from their original meaning that BC/AD are more or less secular; regardless, I find it silly that you must use the non-religious terms to refer to the year.
Forgive us for wanting history to be more secular.
If only...
Actually, I'm curious-- why isn't the turning point the fall of the Roman Empire? If I had to decide, that would be the best event to divide history between.
Because the Roman Empire didn't fall in a single year.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't 476 the year that Rome fell? Obviously the empire was in decline beforehand but something important (the murder of the last Roman emperor, iirc) occurred then.
Then again I was never good in history class so I'm probably wrong.
Eh? Before Common Era and Common Era makes perfect sense.BC and AD are better because they actually bother saying what the difference is.