Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
hmmm, ok. i think i can see where you’re coming from here. i would argue that if koko is scum then eir intention wasn’t to waste time but rather to cast doubt on the information town have access to.hm, good point. but fwiw it feels to me like e's more responding to the "what even are cult mechanics" discussion that started with Trebek and Seshas circa 325/326, which everyone in the thread was talking about at that timemm, i agree somewhat on this point to an extent, but i got similar and much more pronounced feelings from koko's posts here and here. i'd be curious to hear your thoughts on those and how you feel they compare to the posts from seshas's you specified.Seshas' posts in the early 300s (e.g. 326, 334) feel disingenuous in a way I find difficult to describe? like, Seshas is an experienced player who's demonstrated consistently that she's good at the game, so it doesn't make sense to me for her to be confused about cult mechanics. maybe I'm jumping to conclusions but it feels more like she was trying to waste time/lead discussion into an unproductive direction/raise doubts about how mechanics work when it's easy to just like... look up cults on the mafiascum and mafiauniverse wikis
if koko is scum, the posts you pointed out could be an opportunistic attempt to keep wasting time, but if e's villager, they could easily just be what everyone else was doing, talking in circles because the topic was at hand
tldr I guess I feel like those posts are kind of null indicator value because I feel like they're following the flow of everyone else in thread at that time, whereas I'm leaning more to scumreading Seshas' posts bc they're a significant part of what kicked off that topic in the first place
i disagree tbh. however: i do think the fact that e emself brought up the point of it not applying to jesters etc (at least iirc) is something, and it’s given me some pause. that’s probably the major thing contradicting my read of em.i just keep kinda thinking that, gun to head, i think it sounds more earnest than not
but then e figured it out on eir own so idkwhat gives me pause on reading koko as earnest in the thing i quoted is that, uh, i think the 3p oversight is kind of big and i think koko would probably have known. it's kind of up to "how likely is it that e really thought emself in circles like that, given experience level" and i'm ... not sure. if seshas gets another vote i might move to balance wagons tbh
-m
at 8 eastern i thinkcan someone remind me when eod is again?
can someone remind me when eod is again?
Day 1 will end in 48 hours, at 5pm Pacific on July 22nd and midnight UTC on July 23rd.
in 2.5 hourscan someone remind me when eod is again?
to respond to both this and kyeugh's prompt wrt scumbuddies, which I seem to have lost amidst the quote hell:Inclined to say this specific tack makes Seshas/koko not w/w at least. It's like... if they were mafia partners, of course koko would be acting in "good faith" about a threat to both of them, so that occurs less to say?I feel like he's rushing a stance on the cultist thing for the purpose of taking one, instead of proceeding in good faithkokorico
oh yeah, so what you have on Seshas is that they're probably not w/w with Kokorico, which I agree with, but that ultimately just circles back to the strange level of confidence on Kokorico being scumthat's not really all i have for seshas. i don't believe these wagons are v/v, and seshas voted very early and basically unprompted for a player i also scumread. that's a good look for her in my eyes. it just happens that i'm also not particularly convinced by the arguments against her. i don't expect my read on koko to work for everyone, which is why i haven't been pushing it.funny enough, I feel the exact same way about you. the PM thing probably clears you, but if it wasn't for that, I'd be wigged to a burning intensity about how set you are on Seshas being town and Kokorico being mafia, when all you have on the former is "I disagree with the going scumspec" (which points to a null read, not a town read) and all you have on the latter is "vibe bad", despite you and Seshas being prompted to elaborate multiple times by now.
it's not the fact that you're scumreading seshas alone that bothers me here. tbh² doesn't like her either, and they're one of my top town reads. but tbh² is willing to participate in a discussion about it and critically consider their reads and the reads of others, whereas you've established a pattern of running into give your reads or point at those of others who agree with you, and then neglect to engage with points other people make beyond that you don't like them (for no clear reason other than that they contradict your read), which is something that irks me a lot. you're not really participating in a discussion here, you're just pushing a wagon, and a fairly flimsy one at that.
like what?anyways -- the issue isn't that you're saying "she doesn't sound scummy", it's that you both keep introducing reasoning that Seshas herself never made. if I'm scumreading her, I'm obligated to figure out what her real thinking process was, but if you're townreading her, shouldn't her own arguments be self-sufficient?
like i've said a few times, we should absolutely not be using the lynch for the cult, least of all before we know for sure a cult even exists. it was just speculation.
In other words, generically I feel like third party hunting is pro-both mafia and town but town should probably focus on hunting for mafia, so like... I guess I'm landing at ehh I feel like Seshas probably just states that regardless of alignment if they really do have a cultist read on Trebek, with the "I don't feel like killing him for it" being a 'pro-town' addendum
disagree that it would look bad for skylar (by virtue of "town defending scum doesn't make town scummy")if seshas is scum, that'll reflect poorly on hydreigon, who seshas keeps randomly pointing to as towny, and on kyeugh, because the thing with the PM is a good look but like, not an obligate clear
i am very interested in hydreigon getting back around to giving seshas thoughts thoughdisagree that it would look bad for skylar (by virtue of "town defending scum doesn't make town scummy")if seshas is scum, that'll reflect poorly on hydreigon, who seshas keeps randomly pointing to as towny, and on kyeugh, because the thing with the PM is a good look but like, not an obligate clear
-m
I think the cults at this point in time are probably not real, since we found that our singular piece of evidence for a cult existing is untrustworthy anyways@Seshas can you elaborate on your Trebek progression for me, and how you're viewing the possibility of cult at this time?