Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
Swarms in Generation Six are the same thing, except they're Pokémon Team Plasma stole and released.Swarms in the earlier games were caused by trainers mass-releasing boxfuls of breeding leftover pokemon.
The pokedex is a ridiculous over-exaggeration of a pokemon's abilities.
Contrary to what seems to be the popular belief, the journey undergone by the videogame protagonists is highly exceptional, not normative. Game canon seems to be pretty clear in that starter Pokémon aren't actually starter Pokémon, but just hand-me-downs you get for doing a favor to the local professor, and as a whole they seem to be waaaaay to rare to be given away nily-willy to everyone. And besides, the real world stands as good proof that, if given the chance to own a Charizard, most people would take the hell out of it, so it'd have to be suspect that literally the only person you see toting one around is your rival if you picked Bulbasaur. (so a few of them have Charmander and Charmeleon, but very few)
On a similar vein to the above, the player character has exceptional amounts of natural talent and their abilities with raising Pokémon are not indicative of the average trainer's. Most people out there can only handle at most three of them at once, and preferrably the ones that are easy to raise; and a lot of trainers specialize in a single type of Pokémon because Pokémon of the same type tend to have much of the same needs -- tending to three Ice-types would be much simpler than tending to one Ice-type, one Fire-type and one Electric-type. The fact that the player character can effortlessly handle six at once no matter how difficult they may individually be or how diverse they are is a sign of their great innate skill, and that's why the player character gets lavished with so much praise and doesn't even have too much trouble making it to Champion. But even these supremely talented individuals wouldn't be able to deal with seven at once. It's not an arbitrary League limit or anything, it's just literally the furthest anyone has ever managed to go.
Famous Pokémon Trainers are to Pokémon society something akin to what famous soccer players are to our society. They may have a lot of fans and get a lot of interviews and respect and royalty treatment, but they won't exactly be politicians or diplomats or policemen (although they can sometimes play vigilante, as we have seen frequently), and anyone who doesn't care much for the sport probably won't even know who they are.
I like the idea of a pokedex being like a really poorly-moderated wikipedia run mostly by ten-year-olds. it explains why a lot of the heights and weights of pokemon are kind of wack, and why you get entries that are like 'charizard can melt boulders!!!!!!!!!!!'
The pokémon world has lower gravity than Earth.
This would explain how so many characters in the Anime can jump so high, and how pokémon with high weights and disproportionate wing sizes could still suspend themselves in the air.
Also, pokémon are weak. By which I mean, any sort of elements they use and most feats of strength are not /that/ destructive. A human can survive a full-power Thunderbolt from an Electric-type pokémon, which shouldn't be possible in real life. Similarly, people hit with a Flamethrower are only a bit singed, and in FRLG when Loreli's Lapras used Hyper Beam on that one Rocket Grunt, he was only flung back and hit the wall. In general, the 'elements' that pokémon have control over aren't as powerful as they would be in the natural world. An actual lightning bolt would be much stronger than even a Zapdos's Thunder attack.
Using the excuse that the pokemon want to do it
Violence is definitely a part of the narrative I have in mind, but in a rather more subdued way. It was entirely out of control at first, and Pokémon were very much prone to dying in battle, but modern Pokémon Leagues try to regulate it with strict rulings. It's not as if you absolutely can't go over the limit for it, but if you do you may very well get reported to the authorities. And of course, it raises an interesting question -- how much violence exactly is the acceptable level? For one reason or another, not everyone is satisfied with how Pokémon Leagues answer that question. (Incidentally, Battle Frontiers run on different rules from Pokémon Leagues, includingly in so far as they can be a lot more lax about the violence levels, and the differing ruleset is pretty much the whole reason why they exist)I believe something along these lines - except it's a lot more to do with violence. (Maybe that's what you believe as well?) Pokemon battling, in my mind, is completely immoral, and I'll go over that later, but the sheer violence of it forces most trainers out because their bodies can't handle the hiking over entire continents thing, taking hits from superpowered animals thing, or just plain seeing their own pokemon being demolished over and over again. Especially when they aren't good at it and they end up having pokemon dying on them or getting chased and nearly killed by giant spiders or bees or what-have-you. The PC is one of those rare people with the skill and perhaps lack of morality who is capable of enduring these hardships till the end.
(Also, people you meet along the way with fewer pokemon - they might've had more than that before, but they died. Happens a lot.)
I think Pokémon as civilian defense is a much, much more recent idea than most variations of Pokémon-based violence. Of course, military and criminals are pretty much always the first people to find terrible uses for new technology, but it took a while to catch on with the masses.I think of 'em kinda like rogue knights? Sell-swords kinda?? When you think about it, arming your entire population with pokemon is a great way of defending yourself. There's not much talk of war in the games but there is Lt. Surge, who battled with electric types... Should war ever arise, the greatest trainers would surely lead the charge, with the elite four at the head.
That could be part of the problem. 10yo gets ass kicked by Dragon Tamer, asks them about Dragon Pokémon, gets whole bunch of folksy wisdom instead of proper scientific information. And then writes it right down, word by word, as if it were just that.I think of it more like myths, like those entries were written down centuries ago in the here-be-dragons era?? And never updated since haha.
While I'm not big on the whole "Pokémon morality can only ever possibly be squeaky-clean" thing, and in my headcanon timeline the morality of it (as well as the public perception of it) has definitely changed a whole lot across time, I wouldn't go so far as to regard it as outright animal abuse, as long as one doesn't cross certain lines. There are definitely more moral ways to go about battling than others, though.Anyhow like I was talking above re: morality of pokemon battling - when you get right down to it, you'd never let your actual real life pets fight. Dog fighting/cock fighting is horrible. Using the excuse that the pokemon want to do it - okay, but when you look at like, boxing, or even football, the repercussions of the violence are horrible?? I mean boxing more obviously because it's moreso about the beating each other up, but yeah. And you just kinda have to think about the people who are drawn to boxing, tbh. It's not really the best kinda people (Muhammad Ali...)
I think my statement is made on when, how and whether the dying happens, but just to tack on -- I'm not sure if I'm running with this as a definitive headcanon, but one time, as part of a Nuzlocke, I described an unspoken bond between trainers and Pokémon which allows trainers to perceive when their Pokémon are at their limits, and also has the Pokémon refuse to keep on fighting even if the trainer tries to push them past that limit -- and it's what's usually referred to as "fainting". (Of course, being that it was in a Nuzlocke, the whole point was that the bond had been severed and nobody could figure out how to battle safe without it. Whoopsie!)I tend to think of the games as being more like a nuzlocke than a regular game, so pokemon actually die a lot. Because it makes a lot more sense since they're being super violent??? And these are, for the most part, animals. I mean, not every pokemon is super-intelligent. If they're animals that get their kicks off by being violent, they're gonna be violent. So there'll sometimes be rules like 'no killing' or whatever in battle but yeah, in general, if you're punching things you can't really control what happens to internal organs?? Or setting things on fire?? Eh. (Obviously the other rules of nuzlocke like only catching the first thing on the route don't apply haha.)
So in my idealized pokemon there'd be like, a flag-football version of pokemon battle. Or like pro-bending. It's so much smarter to do it that way anyhow.
there is something hilarious in professor oak creating the pokedex, and thinking "hmmm, i guess i should put some reference material in here to get it started..." [googles ye olde pokemon myths and legends]...I think of it more like myths, like those entries were written down centuries ago in the here-be-dragons era?? And never updated since haha.
There are kids present, but the forum rules also feature at the very start a note that the forum makes no effort to be entirely kid-friendly and children are advised to show discretion in what they view. Since this thread is not marked as mature you'd be best off hiding anything kid-unfriendly with [spoiler=Mature]whatever[/spoiler] tags, and obviously if you'd just rather not include them that's fine (though in that case including them in a redacted form seems sort of pointless), but if you actually want to discuss these headcanons, it's allowed.BOOM! Headshot said:I'm completely convinced that Ditto occasionally inexplicably disappears from the Daycare, only to turn up again after an Egg is produced. This is because [EMPHATICALLY REDACTED].
I also think that Dittos can't breed in the normal way because [REDACTED]*.
[...]
*I'm perfectly well aware that there are kids present in the forum. That's why I'm not exploring these hypotheses here, and replacing them with [REDACTED] tags. Also, I think people would like to continue having undisturbed nights when it comes to Ditto breeding.