Welcome to The Cave of Dragonflies forums, where the smallest bugs live alongside the strongest dragons.
Guests are not able to post messages or even read certain areas of the forums. Now, that's boring, don't you think? Registration, on the other hand, is simple, completely free of charge, and does not require you to give out any personal information at all. As soon as you register, you can take part in some of the happy fun things at the forums such as posting messages, voting in polls, sending private messages to people and being told that this is where we drink tea and eat cod.
Of course I'm not forcing you to do anything if you don't want to, but seriously, what have you got to lose? Five seconds of your life?
I never said that's what it had to be. You did. I just said that's what it seems to me, and even then I was just outlining trends. I never even refuted you! I was actually agreeing with you, but I did point out one thing you overlooked.
And I'm not saying it was eerie or confusing (how did you even get the impression I thought it was confusing, it makes perfect sense), it's just Mai can be a real asset for the innocents, and the fact she died the first night isn't exactly the best things for us. (well, any innocent dieing isn't exactly the best thing for us, but someone like Mai is worse)
And I'm sorry my wording may not be the best, but I just write what I'm thinking, alright? There's no need to go on tirades about the flaws in my statements.
I was just trying to help :/
It's not quite that simple. It isn't a good thing for us to just throw away players on our side, if you happen to be one. As the uninformed majority, the only sure things we've got going for us against the innocents are our numbers and being able to lynch during the talk-phase. Keeping this advantage is pretty important, since it's probably the only way we can win! And not lynching someone during the talk-phase means that the innocents would have to kill em during the action-phase to get rid of em; while that's happening, they're not killing anybody else.
I don't really think your power is that good for the mafia, especially not so much that it'd be worth using up a lynch and losing a mafia member. (You even seemed to think your role was useless yourself when you first claimed!) What even makes lynching you and then lynching two people the next talk-phase different from lynching one of those two people instead of lynching you and then lynching the second the next talk-phase, if you're really mafia? The two things I can think of are that we'd definitely lose one of our number unnecessarily and we might have more information to go on the next night to choose two people to lynch, or we might not. And I'm still unable to think of any situation where being able to lynch two people in one talk-phase would be necessary, and even if one came up, we'd have to be able to predict that the night before and lynch you then, or you'd have to die during the day.
I agree; inactive lynches are annoying. :c I guess for now it'd be better not to lynch, since we've got no reason to suspect anybody (except DarkAura a bit) and lynching somebody random because ey might be innocent because anyone could be innocent is no fun! I'll go ahead and vote no lynch, then.
Abstinence will not be permitted.
I'm vanilla -- I haven't had anything to offer, if that explains my inactivity. Any posts of mine would have been useless because I have nothing to contribute to the conversation.
Preferrably without unneccesary roleclaims that'll make it easier for the innocents to decide who they target next.
Oh dear. Maybe we should have learned who was not scum before getting two votes...
You don't need a role to have something to talk about. :( The point of the game is to figure things out based on discussion, not just night actions (sitting around abstaining and voting off inactive people until some role gives us information is no fun at all) and we can't do that if people don't talk! Giving your opinion on things is a good contribution, too (and does not have to be the same thing as bandwagoning, might I add); you don't have to post only to give us entirely new information!
everyone said:Flower Doll/Bobino/Glace
Good point. Although it doesn't get rid of the possibility that he could be a powerless innocent lackey or a role of that sort, him not being around is a good reason not to kill him.I don't know for Bobino, though. Ey apparently hasn't logged in the whole time, so ey isn't killing anyone. Which means we'd definitely be lynching someone who isn't hurting us, instead of only probably lynching someone who isn't hurting us!
Abstaining from voting isn't forbidden; voting for abstinence, on the other hand, is.Hiikaru ♥;523669 said:Metallica Fanboy: How do the votes work today, exactly? Does everyone have to vote twice? Is every vote counted toward two people so that the people with the first most and second most votes will be lynched? What if there's a tie? Also can things be orchestrated so that only one person dies?
Also if everyone has to vote twice, what are you going to do about the people who vote once if they won't come back, or about the people who don't vote at all either because they're not here or aren't playing?
Hiikaru ♥;523669 said:I don't know for Bobino, though. Ey apparently hasn't logged in the whole time, so ey isn't killing anyone. Which means we'd definitely be lynching someone who isn't hurting us, instead of only probably lynching someone who isn't hurting us! (and maybe lynching someone who is, instead)
If we have to kill someone then yes, getting rid of someone definitely useless is better than getting rid of someone useful, but it also means we have no chance of hitting a role that's hurting us. I guess Bobino could technically be innocent and then that would be a little helpful, but it would still be more helpful if we could lynch someone who's actually a problem.